I read in Dworkin’s book, justice for hedgehogs (p.95), this interesting case for uncertainty – to be distinguished from indeterminacy – fashionable in law schools whenever one cannot make his mind for or against a case: “Absolute confidence or clarity is the privilege of fools and fanatics. The rest of us must the best we can: we must choose among all the substantive views on offer by asking which strikes us, after reflection and due thought, as more plausible than the others. And if none does, we must then settle for the true default view, which is not indeterminancy but uncertainty.” Continue reading Uncertainty and indeterminacy according to Ronald Dworkin